Open editor →

Four models. One winner.

Four models. One brief. No winner speech.

Visual review · 2026-09-05 · Reported run: $0.118. meta/muse-image/text-to-image · wavespeed-ai/krea-v2/turbo · xai/grok-imagine-image/v2.0/text-to-image · recraft-v4

The look

Muse Image · reported $0.01 — Four models. One winner.
Muse Image · reported $0.01 · Download
Krea 2 Turbo · reported $0.01 — Four models. One winner.
Krea 2 Turbo · reported $0.01 · Download
Grok Imagine Image 2.0 · reported $0.06 — Four models. One winner.
Grok Imagine Image 2.0 · reported $0.06 · Download
Recraft V4 · reported $0.038 — Four models. One winner.
Recraft V4 · reported $0.038 · Download

All four rendered the requested heading and footer. Grok drew recognizable tire levers; Muse, Krea and Recraft produced less accurate tool shapes. One prompt demonstrates why task-specific checks matter; it is not a general ranking. The sample was generated on 5 September. Open workflow uses the current model ID after a provider-name migration; the original sampled graph is retained below.

Make them all draw the same poster. Keep the one that got the useful details right — polish is not the same as a tire lever.

Make it yours

  1. Open the graph — save first if the canvas already has your work. Undo brings yours back.
  2. Rewrite Shared test brief. The four image nodes already pin Muse, Krea 2 Turbo, Grok Imagine Image 2.0, and Recraft V4. Run spends four images.
  3. Exact heading and footer, the wheel, two hooked plastic tire levers, composition, color. On the saved set every model got the type; only Grok drew recognizable levers. One prompt is not a ranking. The open workflow uses current model IDs after a provider-name migration.
  4. The reviewed run reported $0.118 (Muse $0.01, Krea $0.01, Grok $0.06, Recraft $0.038). Four paid image calls. Prices and results vary.
Open this noodle → See the reviewed run

Download workflow · Original sampled graph · Explore MCP tools · awesome-noodles