Compare four image models

One prompt → four images to compare.

Visual review · 2026-09-05 · Reported saved run: $0.118. meta/muse-image/text-to-image · wavespeed-ai/krea-v2/turbo · xai/grok-imagine-image/v2.0/text-to-image · recraft-v4

A shared bicycle-workshop poster brief branches into four image models. Compare the lettering, object count and tool shapes before choosing a result.

Saved result

Muse Image · reported $0.01 — Compare four image models — Muse Image · reported $0.01 · Download

Krea 2 Turbo · reported $0.01 — Compare four image models — Krea 2 Turbo · reported $0.01 · Download

Grok Imagine Image 2.0 · reported $0.06 — Compare four image models — Grok Imagine Image 2.0 · reported $0.06 · Download

Recraft V4 · reported $0.038 — Compare four image models — Recraft V4 · reported $0.038 · Download

Four versions of the same bicycle-workshop poster. Compare the exact lettering and the tire-lever shapes. These saved results use Krea for contender 2; the current workflow uses Flare, which has not been sampled here.

Make it yours

Open the graph — save first if the canvas already has your work. Undo brings yours back.
Rewrite Shared test brief once. All four image nodes receive it: Muse, GPT Image 2.5 Flare, Grok Imagine Image 2.0 and Recraft V4. Running the whole graph makes four paid image calls.
Check the editor estimate, then run with your NanoGPT key. The archived comparison reported $0.118: Muse $0.01, Krea $0.01, Grok $0.06 and Recraft $0.038. That total covers the saved Krea run. Check the editor estimate for the current models before running.
Check FIX A FLAT, SATURDAY 10 AM, one wheel and two recognizable tire levers across all four results.

The shared brief is unchanged. Contender 2 now uses Flare in place of Krea; its current output and run cost will differ from this saved comparison.

Open this noodle → See the reviewed run

Download workflow · Original sampled graph · Explore MCP tools · awesome-noodles